I joke not I was just trying to get the download from PADS and their server
chocked

I have been out of work for a bit and need to get reacquainted with PADS
because here in NE there is a microcosm of users that use Protel and It was
great while it lasted and better than PADS however I need to get back to
work and will have to back to the hammer and chisel approach I used it for
over 8 years before switching to Protel. I disliked it then and will.
Similarly for AutoCAD, however it is entrenched an I can do nothing about
that, looks like I will need to refamiliarize myself with both.



----- Original Message -----
From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Altium Release Protel DXP ( What is new in protel DXP?)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Altium Release Protel DXP ( What is new in protel
> DXP?)
>
> PADS 5.0?

You may joke,

I keep one seat PPCB/Plogic and at least v5 d/l worked out the box and
metric support is OK.

(still peeved at metric support being snubbed)

John


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Guralnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Altium Release Protel DXP ( What is new
> in protel DXP?)
>
> > LOL.  Take a guess which PCB package demo I will not be
> downloading today.
> 1 try.

************************************************************************
* Tracking #: 96E6BD1E49EBFE4194D31771C0AE98216DE0107B
*
************************************************************************



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to