I joke not I was just trying to get the download from PADS and their server chocked
I have been out of work for a bit and need to get reacquainted with PADS because here in NE there is a microcosm of users that use Protel and It was great while it lasted and better than PADS however I need to get back to work and will have to back to the hammer and chisel approach I used it for over 8 years before switching to Protel. I disliked it then and will. Similarly for AutoCAD, however it is entrenched an I can do nothing about that, looks like I will need to refamiliarize myself with both. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Altium Release Protel DXP ( What is new in protel DXP?) > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Altium Release Protel DXP ( What is new in protel > DXP?) > > PADS 5.0? You may joke, I keep one seat PPCB/Plogic and at least v5 d/l worked out the box and metric support is OK. (still peeved at metric support being snubbed) John > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Guralnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Altium Release Protel DXP ( What is new > in protel DXP?) > > > LOL. Take a guess which PCB package demo I will not be > downloading today. > 1 try. ************************************************************************ * Tracking #: 96E6BD1E49EBFE4194D31771C0AE98216DE0107B * ************************************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *