i hope that my skepticism is misplaced regarding this development

Dennis Saputelli


Terry Harris wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:26:22 -0700, Daniel wrote:
> 
> >Dennis Saputelli wrote:
> 
> >" i am very skeptical about the fading thing which i think is driving the
> >performance degradation "
> 
> >It is unfortunate, but seems to be the consistent testimony of many Protel
> >users that the new DXP software is not improving the ability of pcb designs
> >to do their work better and more effeciently.
> 
> I don't (yet) agree about the 'fading thing'. A mechanism to let you see
> what you are currently interested in amongst the confusing mess of a modern
> high density PCB would be a great productivity aid.
> 
> I don't think I have heard any existing user praising the DXP user
> interface, it seems to be more a case of reluctantly learning and putting
> up with the gratuitious changes to take advantage of new and improved
> features.
> 
> At least this 'fading thing' is a genuinely new feature. I am hopeful it
> will be a very useful but haven't used DXP enough to know.
> 
> Cheers, Terry.
> 


************************************************************************
* Tracking #: BD27DB0D336FB942B798DB161CB2D1D5B163DFE1
*
************************************************************************
-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
www.integratedcontrolsinc.com            Integrated Controls, Inc.    
   tel: 415-647-0480                        2851 21st Street          
      fax: 415-647-3003                        San Francisco, CA 94110

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to