every time i open DXP i feel more stupid and less patient that then
previous time i opened it
i just don't get it
but what's the problem with migrating to win2k? cost?
what are you using now, win98?
if so that could be part of the reason of your dissatisfaction with 99SE
if there is more to it than that please tell
re Pulsonix, do they really read protel files and libraries?
have you used the software?
what are it's compelling features over 99SE?
Dennis Saputelli
Greg North wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> All of the designers here are very disappointed with the DXP software.
> Just the fact that we have to migrate all of our engineers to W2K inorder
> for them to capture their schematics is a disaster!
>
> I just got off the phone with Tom Clark who is a Rep for Pulsonix. (I was
> able to get his number from the Pulsonix website) And I have info being
> sent to me. The full blown package is $4950 and maintance is about 12% per
> yr. Also seats of sch capture only are $200.
>
> Greg
>
> Gregory T. North, C.I.D.
> Sr. CAD Electrical Designer Engineer
>
> Ametek Aerospace Phone: (215) 257-6531 x1632
> 900 Clymer Ave. Fax: (215) 453-8177
> Sellersville, PA. 18960 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
************************************************************************
* Tracking #: F8AAFF090014A44594504B338C8A7F915C65864B
*
************************************************************************
--
___________________________________________________________________________
www.integratedcontrolsinc.com Integrated Controls, Inc.
tel: 415-647-0480 2851 21st Street
fax: 415-647-3003 San Francisco, CA 94110
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *