-- Hoping this mails shows up in time, having some Problems with my mailings to PEDA --

John,

        that is one behaviour I was fighting with when I first entered PEDA-Forum in 
March. 
I had a good contact to Robi Bittler who showed me the way Rich Thompson mentioned 
here by leaving the SolderMAskLayer visible. (Don�t know what the one hase got to do 
with the other) But I did not find out how to show up inner Layers of the via when 
MultiLayer is turned off.
I played with the drawing order and fiind out Prolems using the <<default>> Button. 
After that Erfahrung I gave up and decided that the little twin-colored point inside 
the Multilayer via and the Information of onlineDRC bare (or better: have to be) 
enough Information for Routing.
It is a comfort to see some others are fighting with the same Problems. Perhaps 
Altiium is listen and can offer us some Help or Workaround. 

Or fix it with SP7  8^)


Regards,

Waldemar

____________________________________________________________
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Haddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:09 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Selective tenting on one side only
> 
> 
> One of my pet gripes is that "multilayer" entities are always shown,
> (unless turned off completely) even when they are irrelevant to the
> layer set being displayed.
> 
> In particular, when I'm using blind vias it's particularly difficult
> to work on circuitry on one board side when the other has blind vias
> all over it - not because the DRC stuffs up or anything, but because
> the other side vias are always drawn at the front of the 
> drawing order.
< -- SNIPPajew  -- >
> John Haddy



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to