On 04:44 PM 9/10/2002 -0700, JaMi Smith said:
>Ian - see below
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 3:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [PEDA] flipping board
> > On 02:39 PM 9/10/2002 -0700, JaMi Smith said:
> > >Select everything on the top layer (including all traces and components,
> > >etc.).
> > >
> > >Use E C (Edit Copy) and click on your reference point to set the
> > >point of the copy.
> > >
> > >Turn the bottom layer back on.
> > >
> > >Make the bottom layer the active layer.
> > >
> > >Use E A (Edit Paste Special) to copy the array, and "check off" the boxes
> > >the Paste Special Dialogue for "Paste on current layer", "Keep net name",
> > >and "Duplicate designator", and then click on the "Paste" button.
> > >
> > >Hit "x" on your keyboard to flip the array.
> > >
> > >You will get a warning message that says "Warning: you are attempting to
> > >flip a component to the same side of the board . . . ", but remember, we
> > >changed from the top layer of the board to the bottom layer of the board,
> > >we really are not on the same layer anymore, so where it says "Do you
> > >to continue?", click on the "Yes" button.
> >
>* * * * * * * * * *
> > JaMi,
> >
> > I assume you did not test this.
> >
>Actually, I have now only done it 4 times, and had it work properly all four
>times, from an electrical standpoint (see below).
> > Issue 1) with paste on current layer turned off the entities will be
> > onto their current layers.
> >
>Semantics - when I said "check off" I ment to place a check in those boxes,
>I am truely sorry if this lead to any confusion. The boxes MUST BE checked
>to turn those features ON.

"Check on" is the standard (MS documentation) for having a check/tick/cross 
in a check box - so enabling that option.  I am happy to take it as read 
that you meant to say check the first three boxes.

> > Issue 2) assuming you meant that paste on current layer a should be
> > checked, this is a great way of getting the components mixed up.  Their
> > graphics end up on the top layers abut the component is stated to be on
> > bottom layer.  As well the component is upside down.  It would be OK if
> > get the graphics to the bottom layer as well.
> >
>Very interesting phenomonin here Ian, and while there does appear to be an
>initial problem with the graphics, it is not fatal.

Yes I agree with you. Your plan does work. Well done.

>I assume that you have written up this condition as a BUG in your bug list.
>If not would you please add it now.

No - someone else can prepare the details and I will add. I have said 
before that is how it works.  Provide it to me in the correct form and I 
add it.

>As far as I can tell, at this point, your only really valid complaint is
>that the "overlay" graphics are on the wrong layer, which in fact they are,
>and which I would call a serious BUG, that should be corrected in SP7.

Not only the overly but also the copper layers. The component looks like it 
is on the top layer but its properties show it as being on the bottom layer.

>However, since it may take some time to get SP7,

Dream on.

>you may have to perform a
>two part "work around" in the meantime.
>Part One: After you have placed the Special Paste Array ("copy"), and before
>you deselect all of the things in the "copy", select one of the selected
>components, and select "Global>>", and in the global area change "Selection"
>to "Same", and then select the "Designator" tab and change "Layer" to
>"Bottom Overlay", and then go to the global area and set "Layer to "Same",
>and then do the same on the "Comment" tab, and then hit OK. All of your
>reference designators and component comments should now be where they
>Part Two: After having done all of the above, you will now have to go back
>to your component library and "Update" each component in the design, to get
>the graphics (outline) to go where they belong.
>Sorry for the BUG in the first place, but I believe that you will find that
>this does in fact fix the problem.

Yep I agree.

Your method does flip the board successfully. Well done.

The only graphical items that do not get handled exactly correctly, from my 
look, are the dimension text (text *sometimes* remains to the same side as 
before (vertical dimension), the dimension itself is OK) and coordinates - 
these are just not flipped at all correctly.  I quickly tested most 
graphical elements including rotated fills and rotated strings.

You may want to do a fully clarified and non-ambiguous write up of this 
(pass it by others before posting I suggest) so it is on the public 
record.  This is the first fully correct technique I have seen for flipping 
a section of a design in P99SE.

Well done,
Ian Wilson

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
* Contact the list manager:
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to