After all, no point in giving Cadence money
> that could be spent on beer

Steve,

Not to be a critic but that should have read " No use giving anyone money
that could be spent on COLD beer"

Joe



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Specctra 10.2 Interfaces with 99SE


> 16/06/2003 17:28:22, Shuping Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Thank You, Steve.
> >
> >Do you mean Protel Router can't complete on Dense Board?
>
> Yes  -my reply to Dennis (who also spotted my mistake...) seems to
> have vanished, but here's the outline-
> Specctra 10.2 works well, and routes boards to completion that just
> cause Protel's autorouter to sit still, doing nothing, or route 10% of the
> tracks very badly, then sit still, doing nothing. Very disappointing - and
> the DXP router seems to be just as useless on dense boards. (both work
> OK on easy boards, but if a board's easy enough that Protel's router can
> complete it, my customers want it smaller / cheaper rules / more
> functionality / fewer layers (or all of the above))
>
> > Specctra gave us a very good price to upgrade from V7.1 to 10.2...
>
> I'm not sure that 10.2 is a great improvement over 7.1 (or it wasn't
> vastly better than 8.x, I just needed some ore layers, which forced the
> upgrade)
> If you want to send me a .dsn and a .do, I'll throw it at 10.2 and you can
> see if it's worth the money. After all, no point in giving Cadence money
> that could be spent on beer :)
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to