At 01:17 PM 10/22/2003, you wrote:
Yeah, I get the broken schematic wire thing on my workstation too. Using a Matrox G450 video card.
If you like Protel 2.8 and don't see the benefit to 99SE, then by all means stay with 2.8. I still use 2.8 occasionally, for the pin swapping feature. When manually optimizing routing for a 2 layer PCB.
The 99SE autorouter is better, but still not as good as it should be. It is useful for some digital boards.
Best regards, Ivan Baggett Bagotronix Inc. website: www.bagotronix.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Montgomery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:52 PM Subject: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
> I have been using Protel 2.8 for a long time now. I recently came across a > 30 day demo disk of Protel 99SE that Protel had sent me. I decided to > install it to see what I have been missing by not upgrading. I have sort of > just looked around a little but was rather shocked to discover 3 key things: > > 1 - It's no faster than Protel 2.8 PCB and Advanced Schematic 3.0. I would > have thought that somewhere along the way they would have optimized the > code and sped it up a bit. Apparently this is not the case. > > 2 - The schematic portion of the Protel 99SE (with service pack 6) STILL > suffers from broken lines when panning. You know, when you pan the image > and then pan back, you discover that many of the lines on the screen are > shifted a pixel or two, requiring you to do a full drawing refresh in order > to see the image look good again. > > Does anyone at Protel actually use this thing or do they just write the code > and ponder wistfully about what it's like to actually run the program? I > remember years ago being told by Protel support that the broken line issue > was a "driver problem," and that it only happened on some systems. Well, I > have been using Protel with both ATI and NVidia cards of all different > vintages (and on different OS's - 95, 98, 2K) , and it consistently happens > on ALL of them. As someone who has programmed GDI stuff on Windows quite a > bit, I think the problem is simply that the code they wrote at Protel > suffers from various "off by one" errors, and they are either ignorant or > complacent when it comes to finding and fixing the problem - possibly both. > > All in all, so far I am SO glad I decided to stop upgrading when I did. My > big bitch with Protel has always been that they ignore bugs that affect > everyday use (like drawing a decent image!) while adding new features to > qualify for marketing based upgrades. > > Thanks, > PeterM > > PS - So, does DXP also suffer from the broken line issue when drawing > schematics? >
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *