Le lundi 09/06/08 à 09h11, Thomas Feuerstack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Wow! As Denis already found out, we never had a ProTeXt based on > MiKTeX 2.6, so the next step down is using protext-1.3, working with > MiKTeX 2.5. OK. Thanks :) -- Denis -- http://tug.org/protext/
