On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, joel falcou <joel.fal...@lri.fr> wrote:
> Do people think such stuff (maybe in proto::tree:: or smthg ?) be useful
> additions ?

Definitely. We're dealing with a compile-time AST, but this is still
an AST and we often have to apply transformations to ASTs. Thus,
having higher order metafunctions in Proto just asking us for the
transform to apply on each node or somesuch, would be useful
additions!

-- 
Alp Mestanogullari
http://alpmestan.wordpress.com/
http://alp.developpez.com/
_______________________________________________
proto mailing list
proto@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto

Reply via email to