>what about having some Tree related trasnform/function/meta-function then ? > >I'm often thinking : "dang, this transform is basically a BFS for a node >verifying meta-function foo<>" >and have to rewrite a BFS usign default_ and such, which is relatively easy. > >Now, sometimes it is "dang, this code is basically splitting an AST into >multiples AST everytime I found a bar tag" or "I need to do a DFS" >or even worse, I need to make the AST a DAG :E ... > >Do people think such stuff (maybe in proto::tree:: or smthg ?) be useful >additions ?
I think you should talk to Gordon Woodhull. He's building a metagraph (among others) library, which I am going to use in msm for compile-time calculations and fsm analysis. This means there will be temporarily a metagraph library inside msm as proof of concept until there can be a review. Maybe he can adapt this library for proto analysis? Christophe _______________________________________________ proto mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
