On 15 August 2010 18:30, Thomas Heller <thom.hel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Note that actually it doesn't handle passing parameters by ref ;). And
>> that all the boost.parameter's features are not implemented!
>
> You can't expect everything from an afternoon of work ;)
> Anyway, its purpose is just for having named parameters for function
> arguments (yeah, ref is missing. if there is more interest, we will see what
> can be done).
>

I know, I was just pointing this out because it can be an issue for the users.
It was not intended as a criticism of your great work ;).
_______________________________________________
proto mailing list
proto@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto

Reply via email to