On 10/11/2011 7:50 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:

> Everything's green now, Eric. The problem was not pervasive after
> all; just a couple of fixes solved everything.
> There's no need to revert. It makes me wonder though if we've missed
> something that will blow up in the future. I'll probably have to
> scrutinize classes that use proto::extends and check for overloads.

Indeed, the symbols class blew up as soon as I added a test that
gives it an rvalue parameter. Fixed now.

> You might want to warn other proto users of this potential
> breaking change.

Joel de Guzman

proto mailing list

Reply via email to