On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Joel Falcou <joel.fal...@lri.fr> wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 00:00, Eric Niebler wrote: > >> Thanks. I thought long about whether to handle the fundamental types >> differently than user-defined types and decided against it. The >> capture-everything-by-**reference-by-default model is easy to explain and >> reason about. Special cases can be handled on a per-domain basis as >> needed. >> > > By-value capture of fundamental type is the classical way people do it in > hand-made ET code. The ad-hoc support in proto is IMHO better as you may > really want to capture reference and by the status of Proto of a EDSL > toolkit, flexibility is really wanted :). > > Right. I agree with your opinion. Maybe by defining another domain like "default_domain_fundamental_by_value" (please don't use that name :-)). Thus, the user saves typing "as_child" if all she/he is looking for is to change this behavior. Regards, Fernando.
_______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
