Le 27/07/2012 08:11, Eric Niebler a écrit :
You mean, a proto callable that wraps fusion::transform? No, we don't
have one yet. If you write one, I'll put it in proto.
Naming is becoming an issue, though. We already have proto::transform.
You'd be adding proto::functional::transform that would be totally
unrelated. I think I screwed up with the namespaces. It should probably
be proto::functional::fusion::transform. Urg.
Well, I guess this is a breaking change :s
What I need is maybe more generic as I need to apply an arbitrary
function with arbitrary number of parmaeters, the first beign the
flattened tree, the others begin whatever:
transform( f, [a b c d], stuff, thingy )
=> [f(a,stuff,thingy) f(b,stuff,thingy) f(c,stuff,thingy)]
I'll try and ake it works out of the box first and see how it can be
proto mailing list