On 16/10/2012 03:50 p.m., Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
On 16/10/2012 02:22 a.m., Eric Niebler wrote:
Hi Agustín,
This is just a quick note to let you know that I'm currently at the
standard committee meeting in Portland, and that I'll be unable to look
until this until I get back next week.
Thank you for letting me know.
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://fusionfenix.com
_______________________________________________
proto mailing list
proto@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
For future reference, my issue was resolved at StackOverflow. You can
find it here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13146537/boost-proto-and-complex-transform
Preliminar tests for 100000000 evaluations of a simple expression `p = q
+ r * 3.f` where p, q and r are geometric vectors of 3 ints give the
following promising times:
Regular: 1.15s
Proto: 1.2s
Hand-Unrolled: 0.39s
Proto-Unrolled: 0.8s
Proto expressions build and optimization times are not taken into
account. There is a considerable number of expression copies made by the
expression optimization that cannot be avoided by the compiler. I will
continue my research by implementing a custom evaluation context that
does this optimization 'on the fly', without actually modifying the
expression.
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://fusionfenix.com
_______________________________________________
proto mailing list
proto@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
