You're right. Thanks for catching that. I have updated the file in SVN. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > in protocolBuffers\vsprojects\readme.txt, the "Compiling and > Installing" section seems to still talk about DLLs being built by > default? > > > > On Sep 30, 1:45 am, "Kenton Varda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just before building the 2.0.2 release candidate, I submitted a change to > > make static linking the default for the protobuf libraries under MSVC. > This > > seems necessary to avoid some of the problems inherent in DLLs which have > > been discussed here, such as the fact that each DLL has a separate heap. > > You can still build DLLs by simply changing the libprotobuf and > libprotoc > > projects to be DLL projects -- instructions are included in > > vsprojects/readme.txt. > > > > Let me know if anyone objects to this. I don't use MSVC much so it's > hard > > for me to know what is best for MSVC users. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
