Cool. I think this makes sense as I could use GZIPInputStream with
mergeFrom() and parseFrom().

On Oct 21, 4:20 pm, "Kenton Varda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no built-in support for this, but there's nothing stopping you from
> applying whatever compression you want to the serialized data.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:08 PM, GDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I noticed the protocol buffers store strings in their uncompressed
> > form. Is there any provision to produce and consume protobufs in
> > compressed form? This would be specially helpful if a lot of fields
> > were repeated strings.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to