Thanks Kenton,
I will check both and prefer iterator version.
Ketan
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Kenton Varda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The version with a single repeated field (which presumably you expect to
> always have size 16) will be slightly more efficient on the wire and
> significantly more efficient in-memory (assuming you're using C++).
> I think you'll find the single repeated field version more usable, too --
> you can actually iterate through the contents rather than having to identify
> the all by name.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:51 PM, ketan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which would be more compact representation for matrix:
>>
>> message MatrixR
>> {
>> repeated double mat; // has to ensure that it passes values
>> correctly etc.
>> }
>>
>> OR
>>
>> message RowVector
>> {
>> required double rx = 1;
>> required double ry = 2;
>> required double rz = 3;
>> required double rw = 4;
>> }
>>
>> message Matrix
>> {
>> required RowVector r0 = 1;
>> required RowVector r1 = 2;
>> required RowVector r2 = 3;
>> required RowVector r3 = 4;
>> }
>>
>> or any other efficient method?
>>
>> thx
>> Ketan
>> >>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
