On Jan 7, 8:18 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> IMO, there's not much reason to use the protobuf wire format unless you
> explicitly intend for some users to read/write the format using actual
> protocol buffers.

Not entirely sure what you mean.  This will probably get a lot clearer
once we get Mike's requirements.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to