On Jan 7, 8:18 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> IMO, there's not much reason to use the protobuf wire format unless you
> explicitly intend for some users to read/write the format using actual
> protocol buffers.

Not entirely sure what you mean.  This will probably get a lot clearer
once we get Mike's requirements.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to