On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Alek Storm <alek.st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kenton, do all composite fields in extensions have
> to be optional?  If so, can we document this?


Extensions must be optional or repeated, since a required extension doesn't
make sense.  I'm pretty sure the compiler checks this.  If not, that's a
bug.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to