if you need anything which is yet not supported by the php version,
please let me know, i will add it for you
On 20 Mrz., 14:02, dvirsky <dvir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm considering using protobuf for a client-server project where the
> client is c++, and the server isphpor python running on apache.
> I did a comparison of the unofficial and incompletephplibrary of
> protobuf, and the official python implementation.
> I expected them to be pretty much the same, perhaps with the python
> version being faster. I tested only serialization of very long
> messages (4-8kB), since this is what the server will do mostly.
> the results were that thephpversion is roughly 10 times faster than
> the python version (which was compiled optimized for speed). On my
> test,phpmanaged to serialize about 150 messages per second, and
> python about 15. running with psyco i got it up to 25 but it's still
> very slow.
> Is this reasonable? could I be doing something wrong? It just doesn't
> make sense.
> Both, btw, compared badly to serializing a similar message with thePHPJSON
> library, which managed to do roughly 1500 serializations per
> second. Which I would expect, as it's compiled intoPHPand not
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at