On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jesper <jesper.eskil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think so, but I'll double-check. (Wouldn't that have showed up when >> libprotobuf.lib was linked into the exe?) > > Unfortunately, probably not. Strange crashes at runtime are the usual > symptom. :(
It turned out to be caused by a mismatch in using _SECURE_SCL, i.e. checked iterators. Just to add to the Debug/Release problems, Microsoft has added extra defines which must not be mixed -- _SECURE_SCL affects the binary layout of STL containers, so it has to be defined the same way everywhere, and unfortunately the code I'm working on has a non-default setting for _SECURE_SCL. Thanks anyway for all the help. (BTW: I created a set of CMake (http://cmake.org) build files for Protobufs, in case you're interested in not maintaining parallell Makefiles/project files for Linux/Windows.) -- /Jesper --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
