Google uses its own internal RPC implementation, and I don't think we can endorse a particular third-party one as better than the others. I'd tell you which one I personally found most beneficial, but I have no experience with any of them.
Cheers, Alek On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, J.V. <jvsr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > thanks, which product(s) does Google use internally or find most > beneficial? > > Kenton Varda wrote: > > You could look at one of the open source RPC implementations listed here: > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns#RPC_Implementations > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
