I am a bit nervous about the GCC4 comment in GeneratedMessageFactory::singleton 
 (message.cc):

  // No need for thread-safety here because this will be called at static
  // initialization time.  (And GCC4 makes this thread-safe anyway.)

I'm using gcc 3.3.3.

The singleton object in GeneratedMessageFactory::singleton, is a local static 
of non-POD type.  The C++ standard says:

An implementation is permitted to perform
early initialization of other local objects with static storage duration under 
the same conditions that an
implementation is permitted to statically initialize an object with static 
storage duration in namespace scope
(3.6.2). Otherwise such an object is initialized the first time control passes 
through its declaration; such an
object is considered initialized upon the completion of its initialization.

I don't think the language standard addresses what "first time control passes 
through its declaration" means when two threads call the function 
simultaneously.  Perhaps gcc4 provides features that make that safe.  I don't 
know if that is something that can be relied on in all compilers, however.

Ray

________________________________
From: Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:08 PM
To: Rizzuto, Raymond
Cc: protobuf@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: intermittent issue with encode (version 2.0.3)

I suppose you could also temporarily edit the header file.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Rizzuto, Raymond 
<raymond.rizz...@sig.com<mailto:raymond.rizz...@sig.com>> wrote:

I'm trying to, without success.   Breakpoints in header files, at least with 
the version of tools I have, don't work very well.



________________________________

From: Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com<mailto:ken...@google.com>]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:02 PM
To: Rizzuto, Raymond
Cc: protobuf@googlegroups.com<mailto:protobuf@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: intermittent issue with encode (version 2.0.3)



Run in a debugger and set a breakpoint at wire_format_inl.h:289.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Rizzuto, Raymond 
<raymond.rizz...@sig.com<mailto:raymond.rizz...@sig.com>> wrote:

I think I have an error in my code (C++) that only occurs when I have multiple 
threads, and a lot of message volume.   Even then, I can run the same test many 
times, but only get a failure on some runs.  With 7 threads running on a 4 core 
machine, and generating 480384 google protocol buffer messages, I get 33 errors 
like this to stdout:



libprotobuf ERROR 
/siglinux/tc/sles9sp4_gcc-3.3.3_i686/sig1/protobuf-2.0.3/include/google/protobuf/wire_format_inl.h:289]
 Encountered string containing invalid UTF-8 data while serializing protocol 
buffer. Strings must contain only UTF-8; use the 'bytes' type for raw bytes.



I believe that the data is in error since I get similar errors decoding the 
messages:



libprotobuf ERROR 
/siglinux/tc/sles9sp4_gcc-3.3.3_i686/sig1/protobuf-2.0.3/include/google/protobuf/wire_format_inl.h:138]
 Encountered string containing invalid UTF-8 data while parsing protocol 
buffer. Strings must contain only UTF-8; use the 'bytes' type for raw bytes.



Is there any way that I can check for this at run time so that I can print out 
more context?  I do call IsInitialized before serializing, but that doesn't 
check for this case.



I am running on SLES9SP4, using gcc 3.3.3 as the compiler.



Ray



________________________________

Ray Rizzuto

raymond.rizz...@sig.com<mailto:raymond.rizz...@sig.com>

Susquehanna International Group

(610)747-2336 (W)

(215)776-3780 (C)







________________________________

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its 
attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this 
message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. 
Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed 
as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or 
other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of 
their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or 
accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any 
of its attachments is free of viruses.






________________________________
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its 
attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this 
message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. 
Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed 
as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or 
other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of 
their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or 
accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any 
of its attachments is free of viruses.


________________________________
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its 
attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this 
message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. 
Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed 
as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or 
other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of 
their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or 
accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any 
of its attachments is free of viruses.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to