Yes. I first write the length of the byte array and then write the
byte array all at once.

I don't really understand why the results are completely different
when using RMI. So you assume Java is doing some optimization?

On Aug 28, 4:05 am, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> Did you try what I suggested before -- serializing to a byte array instead,
> and then writing that to the stream all at once?
> It's possible that ObjectOutputStream itself is just really slow, but that
> when using native Java serialization it uses special, highly-optimized code
> paths.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Tai <maitai.tru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I did some similar performance tests based on that:
> >http://thrift-protobuf-compare.googlecode.com/svn
>
> > My tests runs under Java and uses Protocol Buffers 2.2.0.
>
> > Basically I am comparing Java Serialization vs. Protocol buffers with
> > byte size, serialization and deserialization and my results are
> > similar to the performance results as stated here:
> >http://www.eishay.com/2009/03/more-on-benchmarking-java-serialization...
>
> > For serialization I use ByteArrayOutputStream (data stream in
> > ObjectOutputStream) and for deserialization its counterpart:
> > ByteArrayInputStream (data stream in ObjectInputStream).
>
> > But doing the performance test under RMI the performance results are
> > totally different. Here Protocol Buffers is slower(!) than Java
> > Serialization.
>
> > The only difference I can see is that it uses for serialization a
> > BufferedOutputStream (in ConnectionOutputStream) and a DataInputStream
> > (in ConnectionInputStream).
>
> > Does anybody know why that is so?
>
> > Tai
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to