Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Henner Zeller <h.zel...@acm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, George Georgiev >> <georgi.georg...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > Sure, but it is really hard for me to prepare something general since >> > the java output files are located in a different folders based on the >> > package specified in the proto file. >> > >> > I think it will be easier if the protoc provides this feature. >> >> mmh, I understand. > > I don't. Why should be taking on responsibilities of the build system in > protoc?
I once had to program in java and the build tools available in that world are really crappy. So from that point of view I can understand the pain. Maybe if someone wrote an ant-task for protoc then this could take care of it. -h --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
