I've added this to the list of implementations:

<http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns>Looks like we have
two other Common Lisp implementations already, but neither one appears to be
maintained.  :/

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ntd <mechs...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> I wanted to announce a Common Lisp protobuf implementation:
> http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~ndantam3/docs/s-protobuf/
> Currently it can encode and decode all the basic test cases listed in
> the protobuf documentation.  It will also read in the binary output of
> protoc to generate the class and method definitions.  There are still
> plenty of missing features though, as detailed in the link above.
> Hopefully someone will find this useful.
> --
> Neil
> >

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to