I've added this to the list of implementations: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
<http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns>Looks like we have two other Common Lisp implementations already, but neither one appears to be maintained. :/ On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ntd <mechs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I wanted to announce a Common Lisp protobuf implementation: > > http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~ndantam3/docs/s-protobuf/ > > Currently it can encode and decode all the basic test cases listed in > the protobuf documentation. It will also read in the binary output of > protoc to generate the class and method definitions. There are still > plenty of missing features though, as detailed in the link above. > > Hopefully someone will find this useful. > > -- > Neil > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
