Cool. New syntax I didn't know about!  I think this would be useful
for converting the other way around (Proto-to-XML).

On Sep 28, 6:05 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> Another way to do this would be to write code based on protobuf reflection
> and custom options, so you could have a proto like:
>   message Foo {
>     optional int32 i = 1 [(xml_disposition) = ATTRIBUTE];
>     optional Bar bar = 2 [(xml_disposition) = ELEMENT];
>   }
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sim <simon.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all. Would anybody be interested in an XML to Protocol Buffers
> > converter if it were opened up to the community?  I have an XML
> > stylesheet that transforms an annotated XSD set into a Java class that
> > uses JAXB and the Protocol Buffers Java API to convert XML documents
> > into either text or binary mode Protocol Buffers messages.  The XSD
> > annotations define the mappings from XSD elements to Proto messages
> > (although at present staying close to a 1:1 mapping is probably
> > safest). Some fancy XSD features are not yet supported but the usual
> > complexTypes, simpleTypes, elements, and enumerations work.
>
> > Simon Weeks
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to