Matthew, Thanks! Looks like I should RTFM.
:-( Ciao, Peter K. On Sep 30, 12:12 pm, Michael Matthews <heav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm using VC++ 8.0+ with protobuf 2.2.0 and as long as I add the call > toShutdownProtobufLibrary() before > exiting I don't see any memory leaks. > > Michael Matthews > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Peter K. <koots...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > I'm using protocol buffers under Visual C++ and most things are going > > swimmingly (i.e. well). > > > One problem we've noticed is that, when our DLL unloads, VC++ detects > > many memory leaks. > > > The call stack appears to indicate that it is because many of the > > default instances of messages, e.g. tReturn, have calls to "new" for > > them, but do not have subsequent "delete" calls. > > > The generated code contains lines like: > > > tReturn::default_instance_ = new tReturn(); > > > without anything showing up later with "delete > > tReturn::default_instance_ " or code to that effect. > > > Should I be worried? Is there something I'm not doing? > > > Any and all pointers appreciated! (Except NULLs!). > > > Ciao, > > > Peter K. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
