On Oct 30, 2009, at 22:24 , jta23 wrote: > The protobuf version of my code uses about 950MB of memory (the Java > Serializable version is only using around 650MB) and I had the java - > Xmx flag set too low; in reality protobuf is extremely fast compared > to Java Serializable:
Hm. It is a little interesting that it would use so much more memory than using Java serializable ... > Protocol Buffers (CodedOutputStream, but no flush() after each write): > 76,600 msgs/sec This is what I was attempting to describe (one flush() after writing all messages). This matches my expectations that this should be a little faster, which is nice. Evan -- Evan Jones http://evanjones.ca/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
