Wanted to hear the community thoughts on adding another option to support java_implement_interface.
I think it would be very beneficial to be able to have the protoc generate code that would be implementing some signature interfaces in the Java world. Unlike Python or Ruby, where if the method exists on an object, you can call it, in Java the methods must be declared on the classes, so it makes it difficult to write methods that could take multiple types of objects which are of Protocol Buffers type without being able to mark them with an Interface. I've opened an Issue 59 regarding this change and want to gauge the community thoughts on the usefulness of this option. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
