Sorry, I thought I had read in an interview somewhere that you guys were using scons internally. And I actually can get scons to run protoc, I'm just having trouble getting it to read the .proto files from the right source directories and write the .pb.cc and .pb.h files to the right build directories. If there's not a cut-n-paste solution that folks here know about, I'll move this question to a scons discussion group.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Kenton Varda <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, most of Google does not use scons. I've never used it myself. We > mostly use an in-house build system full of Google-specific hacks -- like > how to build protocol buffers. > But it can't be that hard to get scons to run a shell command, can it? > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Thomas Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Sorry if this is a bit of a newbie question, but I'm new to both >> protobuffers and scons. What's the easiest way to get .proto files to >> compile to .pb.cc and .pb.h files? I know you guys use scons at >> google, so I'm hoping that there's a cut-and-paste solution - but if >> now, can someone recommend where to look to figure it out? >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Protocol Buffers" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=. >> >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
