On 11/23/2009 06:27 PM, Kenton Varda wrote: > If you want something that's likely to work with other languages, I'd > just implement RPC over HTTP. Assuming you have HTTP support in R > already it should be pretty straightforward. Otherwise you'll have to > look very carefully at the third-party RPC implementations to figure out > which ones are well-designed (I have not looked closely enough at them > to know): > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns > > Please don't copy the RPC interfaces that are part of protocol buffers > now -- they are going away.
Sorry to get back at this a week after. Can you expand on what is going away. ServiceDescriptor, MethodDescriptor, RpcChannel, Service ? > The service definition language will still > exist, but future versions of protoc will let you plug in a custom code > generator for them. > > 2009/11/22 Romain François <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Hello, > > Is there a comparison of the various rpc implementations somewhere ? > > We are implementing third party support for R and would like to throw an > rpc implementation into the mix, but which one to choose ? > > Romain -- Romain Francois Professional R Enthusiast +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30 http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr |- http://tr.im/FtUu : new package : highlight |- http://tr.im/EAD5 : LondonR slides `- http://tr.im/BcPw : celebrating R commit #50000 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
