Cool Will do. thanks On Jan 8, 12:44 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Vlad <vladimir.sakha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You can add mass assignment to your array operations and that would > > keep you design intact and complete array operation needs. > > It is already possible to reserve and access entire array but you can > > only assign one element at a time. > > Just use a loop. On any modern compiler it will be just as fast as if we > had provided some sort of "mass assignment" method. > > > > > On Jan 7, 6:00 pm, Evan Jones <ev...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 2010, at 17:41 , Vlad wrote: > > > > > inline const ::std::string& name() const; //problem here need > > > > creation of string -> very slow! > > > > This doesn't create a string, it just returns a reference to the > > > string already in the protocol buffer object. If you do: > > > > const char* c_string = protobuffer.name().data() > > > > this gets a pointer to the raw C string inside the C++ string object > > > inside the protocol buffer object. No allocations or copies will be > > > performed. Setting the string, one copy is always performed, as Kenton > > > mentioned. > > > > Evan > > > > -- > > > Evan Joneshttp://evanjones.ca/ > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Protocol Buffers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
