So it is totally out of the scope of this project to add such support?
The changes I've made seem to match with the current architecture. I've
added extended protoc to accept a new file option java_platform (where user
may specify J2SE(default) or J2ME) which makes it produce J2ME compatible
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> There are three J2ME implementations on the third-party list:
> I'd be happy to list yours as well if you'd like.
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Igor Gatis <igorga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi protobuf team,
>> Have you guys considered supporting J2ME?
>> I've extended protoc to generate J2ME compatible code and built its
>> supporting J2ME runtime library. I was wondering if you guys would consider
>> reviewing my changes.
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Protocol Buffers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at