On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:24, CB <[email protected]> wrote: > > Workarounds aside, there is still a bug to be fixed. > > If you wish to argue that the .proto files or the -I options I passed > to proto are invalid, then protoc should have declared an error. > > If you wish to argue that the .proto files and the -I options I passed > to proto are valid, then the c++ code emitted by protoc should have > compiled without error. > > If the error was simply an issue of -I options passed to protoc/g++ > that would be one thing, but in this case, protoc generated a call to > a function that doesn't even exist in the generated code set. That's > a major bug.
Providing a patch that does what you think it should do instead is probably a good way to start the discussion and get it fixed. -h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
