On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:24, CB <cn...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Workarounds aside, there is still a bug to be fixed.
>
> If you wish to argue that the .proto files or the -I options I passed
> to proto are invalid, then protoc should have declared an error.
>
> If you wish to argue that the .proto files and the -I options I passed
> to proto are valid, then the c++ code emitted by protoc should have
> compiled without error.
>
> If the error was simply an issue of -I options passed to protoc/g++
> that would be one thing, but in this case, protoc generated a call to
> a function that doesn't even exist in the generated code set.  That's
> a major bug.

Providing a patch that does what you think it should do instead is
probably a good way to start the discussion and get it fixed.

-h

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to