They'll probably be around forever. But internally we have changed the default of *_generic_services to false. I'm not sure yet if we want to do the same thing in the public release -- internally, we were able to actually update every piece of code that was affected, but obviously we have no such ability publicly.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Algirdasss <algirdas.moc...@gmail.com>wrote: > By the way ... What are your plans about Generic Services in next > protobuf releases? Since v2.3 you encourage RPC implementors to write > their own code generators for constructing services. How long are you > planing to maintain generic service implementation? We liked idea of > generic services and we heavily use it in our project, it saves a lot > of time when you don't have to bother about code generation. > > On Sep 15, 2:53 am, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > > No such plans, sorry. > > > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Zachary Turner < > divisorthe...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity, will this be confined to python 2.x still? We > > > use 3.1, so whenever we have to take a new protobuf release it's > > > always kind of a process porting it to 3.1. > > > > > We can do it again of course, just wondering if 3.x support will be > > > out of the box. > > > > > On Sep 14, 11:28 am, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Petar mostly finished this work, but then left the company. We're > trying > > > to > > > > tie up the loose ends so that we can get it out, but everyone is > pretty > > > > busy. We'll probably do 2.4.0 within a month or two as we have a new > > > team > > > > member who needs to learn the release process, and it should at least > > > > include a beta of this work. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Zachary Turner < > > > divisorthe...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > Reading through old threads, I found one that said that the next > > > > > release would probably include Petar's python wrapper for native > C++ > > > > > protobufs, greatly increasing speed of protubufs when calling from > > > > > Python. > > > > > > > Another post mentioned that this was expected to be done sometime > this > > > > > summer. > > > > > > > Now that summer has come and gone, does anyone have an update about > > > > > when this release might be ready? We're considering re-inventing a > > > > > python / C++ wrapper just because the performance is such a blocker > on > > > > > what we're working on at the moment, but given how long it's been > in > > > > > the works, it seems like it's such a black hole of work that we're > > > > > going to embark on, whereas the magic hammer solution might only > just > > > > > around the corner. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > > > > "Protocol Buffers" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > <protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c om> > > > <protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c om> > > > > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Protocol Buffers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > <protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c om> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
