Note that I only includes enough code to handle the specific example in the blog experiment.
For the sake of the group, this discussion centres around an implicit contract inferred from a table structure, but persisted as a valid protobuf stream (a .proto could also be generated in theory). Marc On 15 Oct 2010, at 21:30, AndrewD <andrew.de...@kellpro.com> wrote: > Yes, I do mean .Net DataSets, and I am interested in this. Your blog > post is very awesomely cool to me! We will be at a point in a couple > of weeks were I will want to evaluate this for some alpha development > we are doing. If it isn't yet able to serialize a full DataSet, I can > certainly try to finish the coding for that. > > Thanks! > - Andrew > > > On Oct 15, 2:14 pm, Marc Gravell <marc.grav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If you mean . Net data sets, I blogged about this earlier this week: >> >> marcgravell.blogspot.com >> >> Note I only experimented with a single DataTable, but that is most of the >> hurdle. The code using protobuf-net v2 is **experimental** and incomplete, >> but committed. If if is something you'd be interested in me pursuing further >> let ne know. >> >> Marc >> >> On 15 Oct 2010, at 16:11, AndrewD <andrew.de...@kellpro.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I'm curious if anyone here has used protobuf to serialize DataSets? I >>> saw an earlier discussion, but it didn't seem to go anywhere. >>> If DataSets are not currently serializable, how would I go about >>> making them serializable? My main goal here is performance and space, >>> not necessarily interoperability. I don't care if the DataSet doesn't >>> get serialized using a schema of some sort... we could just serialize >>> the DataSet as an object (for example, a DataSet contains a list of >>> DataTable objects, a DataTable contains a list of DataRow objects, a >>> DataRow object contains an array of object values, etc). >>> Is it possible in protobuf to define a way to serialize a 3rd party >>> object (one for which I cannot add the protobuf attributes)? >> >>> Thanks! >>> - Andrew >> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Protocol Buffers" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
