Yes; *at the moment* I don't make that search path very accessible. When I
have the lid up I'll look at that, but for now if you really need to handle
a complex include path, there is an ugly workaround... and not via the IDE
tools (only at the command line).

Marc

On 13 December 2010 22:18, Thad <[email protected]> wrote:

> > - Improved code generation, including running protoc automatically,
> > providing options on the command line instead of in the proto file,
> > and removing the options dependency from the generated code
>
> A thought on that:
> I was looking at Marc's generator today to figure out how to get a --
> proto_path argument passed through from the CustomTool runner in
> Visual Studio. Unless I'm missing something, it appears that VS
> doesn't provide a very nice way to get arguments to a custom tool on a
> per-file basis. He is using the "Custom Tool Namespace" property to
> piggyback in arguments to the code generator. From a usage perspective
> this is fairly messy but I couldn't find a better way to do it. I
> thought at the time that if it were possible to specify custom options
> directly in the file (like dotnet-protobufs) it would be a whole lot
> cleaner.
>
> Having the command line option is probably better for a build script
> generating the files, but if you ever package it up into a custom tool
> for VS, it might be nice to still be able to specifying the options in
> the file.
>
> -Thad
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<protobuf%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Marc

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to