Cool! Thank you for the clarification. On Jan 13, 5:44 pm, Jason Hsueh <jas...@google.com> wrote: > By the way this is documented > here:http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/cpp-genera... > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Jason Hsueh <jas...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Linus <suram.su...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I am new to PB and I just ran into this. Is it possible that the PB > >> compiler does not generate set_<...> methods for some nested messages? > > >> Here is an example: I don't see set_<...> methods for ANY of the > >> parameters in the db message. > > > For message type fields, there is no set_<...> method. The codegen produces > > mutable_<...> methods instead. Otherwise it is easy to write inefficient > > code - set would require a potentially expensive copy of the message. > > >> What am I missing??? > > >> package pd; > > >> message nv > >> { > >> repeated int32 Length = 1; > >> } > > >> message dp > >> { > >> required int32 DesignID = 1; > >> repeated double Design = 2; > >> } > > >> message Shape > >> { > >> required int32 size_m = 1; > >> required int32 size_n = 2; > >> } > > >> message ds > >> { > >> required int32 DesignID = 1; > >> repeated double data = 2; > >> } > > >> message db > >> { > >> required nv numVars = 1; > >> repeated dp despar = 2; > >> required Shape db_size = 3; > >> repeated ds dtst = 4; > >> } > > >> On Jan 13, 1:48 pm, Linus <suram.su...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hello, > > >> > I have nested messages like the following (it is a little more > >> > complicated, but i am trying to simplify with this example). > > >> > package DB; > > >> > message Header > >> > { > >> > required int32 ID=1; > >> > message param > >> > { > >> > required int32 size_m = 1; > >> > required int32 size_n = 2; > >> > } > >> > required param p = 2; > > >> > } > > >> > message data > >> > { > >> > repeated double = 1; > > >> > } > > >> > message DB > >> > { > >> > required Header = 1; > >> > required data = 2; > > >> > } > > >> > The problem I am having is that the accessor methods generated for the > >> > "DB " does not have a > >> > set_param( DB::Header::param ). > > >> > Is there something wrong with how I am structuring my messages? Any > >> > help is appreciated. > >> > Please let me know if this post is unclear and I will try and explain > >> > myself better. > > >> > Thanks! > >> > Linus > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Protocol Buffers" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > >> . > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
