Yes; I made a response - it was never answered. My points approach both specific implementation concerns, and bandwidth concerns (which are typically more important in real terms). In my tests (focusing on only a single implementation) there claim held no water.
http://groups.google.com/group/msgpack/browse_thread/thread/db5e20aa64f3020d?pli=1 Marc Gravell On 2 August 2011 08:51, Canggih Wibowo <[email protected]> wrote: > MessagePack claims that they 4 times faster than Protobuf on > serialization+deserialization and it also have RPC implementation already. > Anyone give response? I mean, what's the Protobuf's superiority than > messagepack. > Sorry, i'm new to Protobuf. > > thanks. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > -- Regards, Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
