(note: this is specific to protobuf-net, not "protocol buffers" more
widely), but yes: that (a generic list) would work fine, as long as the
property has been marked for serialization and given a number. There also
doesn't need to be a "set" accessor, although it can make full use of a
"set" - i.e. if it finds the list is "null", it will create a new list of
the appropriate type and use the "set" to update the object.
So, your code would be fine if it has been designated a number, or a
related example:
[ProtoMember(4)]
public List<Order> Orders { get { return orders; } }
private readonly List<Order> orders = new List<Order>();
Marc
(protobuf-net)
On 20 June 2012 13:08, Farooq Mushtaq <farooqmushta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How can we serialize list of objects by using protobuf-net? Is
> protobuf-net support list of objects like
> public List(ABC) DEF
> {
> get;
> set;
> }
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/W0yySDcbES8J.
> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
>
--
Regards,
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
