Comment #26 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
If you have a lite and full jar, from an OSGi perspective, it is better *not* to distinguish the package exports i.e. for the packages that overlap, the package export spec should be exactly the same. The only difference will be that the full jar will export extra packages.
That way users can decide (based on which packages they need to import) which jar they need to use.
This approach also lends towards good code structure -- "full jar" functionality will be isolated at the package level.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
