On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:40 PM, <crotty.christop...@gmail.com> wrote:

> True enough, but the marshalling/unmarshalling performance can be measured.
>
> I guess my question would have been better worded as...
>
> "I have a project that needs to send objects between a Java and a C++
> service at a rate of up to several thousand object/second.  Would you
> recommend using protocol buffers in such a scenario?"

Well, almost all Google servers are talking protocol buffers to each other
and that's what protocol buffers are designed for.


>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:09:31 AM UTC-5, 肖锋 wrote:
>>
>>
>> Protobuf is a data marshaling library. How is its performance related to
>> the way you used to transfer the data? I think the two are independent.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/ppCfsEglYaIJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to