On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:18 AM, <kingsley.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I saw the changes of protobuf in version2.5, I was so excited to see
> that the performance of java deserialization promoted. But I test this new
> feature, and I found that it is worse than protobuf in version2.4. I don't
> know why. Here is my code of using new feature.
>
> Log log = Log.PARSER.parseFrom("xx");
>
Can you provide to us the definition of your proto message and the
benchmark results?


>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to