Comment #2 on issue 464 by anno.lan...@gmail.com: Inefficient Java handling
of repeated list of primitive types
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=464
I produced a different fix that preserves the immutability of the
non-builders and, specifically, does not expose the underlying array in the
interface. This solution, drags in a dependency to fastutil. I think the
people who are concerned about this issue would actually approve of
fastutil in their classpath. General protobuf users might be harder to
motivate for the additional dependency.
Attachments:
fastutil-list-types-for-repeated-primitive-field.patch.bz2 2.9 KB
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
