Comment #2 on issue 464 by [email protected]: Inefficient Java handling
of repeated list of primitive types
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=464
I produced a different fix that preserves the immutability of the
non-builders and, specifically, does not expose the underlying array in the
interface. This solution, drags in a dependency to fastutil. I think the
people who are concerned about this issue would actually approve of
fastutil in their classpath. General protobuf users might be harder to
motivate for the additional dependency.
Attachments:
fastutil-list-types-for-repeated-primitive-field.patch.bz2 2.9 KB
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
