Comment #7 on issue 429 by [email protected]: Support ByteBuffer in
CodedInputStream and CodedOutputStream to avoid redundant copies for direct
ByteBuffer.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=429
This is not fixed. CodedInputStream makes a copy of the entire buffer if
using native buffers, which could be expensive in cases. The title
indicates an issue of "redundant copies" and creating an entire copy of a
ByteBuffer seems like this.
I suppose it could be managed by wrapping the ByteBuffer as an InputStream
like the CodedOutputStream does.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
