Jon, I'm also interested in oneof support for C#. On Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:51:10 AM UTC-6, Jon Skeet wrote: > > Yes, oneof support would probably be the top of my list :) > > We clearly need to support the whole proto language - but there are Java > API changes which may not be as useful in the C# community which aren't > really part of the proto language itself. > > This quarter is becoming incredibly busy for me, but it's useful to know > that there's some pent up demand... > > Jon > > > On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 19:28:07 UTC+1, Brian Banks wrote: >> >> Jon, for me personally, I'd really like support for the new "oneof" field. >> >> Glad to see you have plans to update it. I appreciate your work. >> >> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:37:36 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote: >>> >>> On Monday, 22 September 2014 05:47:04 UTC+1, RyanE wrote: >>>> >>>> Are there any plans to add C# to the list of supported language >>>> for Protocol Buffers in 2015 or sooner? >>>> >>> >>> There are already two mature implementations - protobuf-net ( >>> https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/) and protobuf-csharp-port ( >>> https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/). The latter is "my" >>> project, and while it's been slumbering somewhat recently, I plan to get >>> back into it "soon" to support the newer features such as oneof. I haven't >>> yet decided exactly how many of the Java API changes I'll port across - >>> time will tell. Is there any specific feature you're looking for which >>> isn't supported by either of these projects? >>> >>> Jon >>> >>>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
