I'm new to protobuf and I'd very much like to have *obsolete* as a part of protobuf grammar. (Unless I am missing something)
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 at 3:31:00 AM UTC-8, Mike Reed wrote: > > Hi, > Would it not be better to introduce a new "field rule" called "obsolete" > rather than a convention of prefixing a field name with "OBSOLETE_". This > would mean that the code generator can check you do not re-use the tag but > will not actually generate any code for the obsolete field. > Apologies if someone has already suggested this. I did search the forums > but found nothing. > Mike. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
