Hmm, I'm wondering if that starting block never actually executes.
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, 17:05 Noel Yap <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm seeing the generated code having in a `static` init block:
> ```
> com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.FileDescriptor
> .internalBuildGeneratedFileFrom(descriptorData,
> new com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.FileDescriptor[] {
>
> com.example.proto.options.api_docs.ApiDocsOptionsProto.getDescriptor(),
> com.example.proto.options.ServerOptionsProto.getDescriptor(),
> }, assigner);
> com.google.protobuf.ExtensionRegistry registry =
> com.google.protobuf.ExtensionRegistry.newInstance();
> registry.add(com.example.proto.options.ServerOptionsProto.server);
> com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.FileDescriptor
> .internalUpdateFileDescriptor(descriptor, registry);
> com.example.proto.options.api_docs.ApiDocsOptionsProto.getDescriptor();
> com.example.proto.options.ServerOptionsProto.getDescriptor();
> ```
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:54 PM Adam Cozzette <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You may also need to provide an ExtensionRegistry as described here
>> <https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/java-generated#extension>
>> when you parse the proto, in order for the extension to be visible.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Noel Yap <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> One piece of possibly important information. The code being written is
>>> for a `protoc` plugin. I've updated the Stackoverflow question to state
>>> that.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:42 PM Noel Yap <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> proto.getDescriptor().getFile().getOptions() didn't work. If I print
>>>> that out, I see:
>>>>
>>>> java_package: \"com.google.protobuf\"\njava_outer_classname:
>>>> \"DescriptorProtos\"\noptimize_for: SPEED\ngo_package: \"
>>>> github.com/golang/protobuf/protoc-gen-go/descriptor;descriptor\
>>>> <http://github.com/golang/protobuf/protoc-gen-go/descriptor;descriptor%5C>"\nobjc_class_prefix:
>>>> \"GPB\"\ncsharp_namespace: \"Google.Protobuf.Reflection\"
>>>>
>>>> I've also tried `proto.getOptions()`. That shows the options like
>>>> `java_package` but `hasExtension` for the extension I'm setting is still
>>>> returning `false`.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:53 PM Adam Cozzette <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I posted an answer on your StackOverflow post but let me know if you
>>>>> still have any trouble with that.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Noel Yap <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45970986/how-to-get-value-of-protobuf-custom-option-in-java
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Protocol Buffers" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
